Domestic Animal Endocrinology
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 313-334, October 2007

Cloning and functional characterization of allelic variation in the porcine prolactin receptor

  • Josephine F. Trott

      Affiliations

    • Lactation and Mammary Gland Biology Group, Department of Animal Science, University of Vermont, 221 Terrill Hall, 570 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
  • ,
  • Nicholas R. Farley

      Affiliations

    • Lactation and Mammary Gland Biology Group, Department of Animal Science, University of Vermont, 221 Terrill Hall, 570 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
  • ,
  • Douglas J. Taatjes

      Affiliations

    • College of Medicine, University of Vermont, 89 Beaumont Avenue, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
  • ,
  • Russell C. Hovey

      Affiliations

    • Lactation and Mammary Gland Biology Group, Department of Animal Science, University of Vermont, 221 Terrill Hall, 570 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05405, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 802 656 2683; fax: +1 802 656 8196.

Received 28 May 2006; received in revised form 7 July 2006; accepted 9 July 2006. published online 14 August 2006.

Abstract 

Prolactin (PRL) regulates various functions in pigs including reproduction, mammary development and lactation. We used 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′-RACE) to clone three full-length alleles of the porcine PRL receptor (pPRLR) from Landrace (alleles LR2 and LR4) and Yucatan miniature (MP) pigs, corresponding to the A and B alleles previously reported to be associated with reproductive traits. When expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells, all three pPRLRs transduced differentiation signals to a β-casein promoter with the same effectiveness, where human growth hormone (hGH) and porcine PRL (pPRL) were more effective ligands than ovine PRL (oPRL). The pPRLR had a lower binding affinity for oPRL than pPRL while binding affinity for hGH was not different between the three pPRLR variants. The pPRLRs primarily localized to the cytoplasm with perinuclear concentration. In conclusion, we have cloned three allelic variants of the pPRLR and have functionally characterized these as different from the hPRLR. However, our data do not support the proposal that allelic variation of the pPRLR confers functional differences in vivo.

Abbreviations: AMV-RT, avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase, CHO-K1, Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells, ECD, extracellular domain, EF, elongation factor-α1, h, human, hGH, human growth hormone, HRP, horseradish peroxidase, LPG-A, lysosomal membrane glyocoprotein-A, LR, Landrace, MMLV-RT, Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, MP, miniature pig, o, ovine, p, porcine, PRL, prolactin, PRLR, prolactin receptor, RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends

Keywords: Reproduction, Prolactin receptor, Tissue distribution, Polymorphism, Porcine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0739-7240(06)00122-6

doi:10.1016/j.domaniend.2006.07.001

Domestic Animal Endocrinology
Volume 33, Issue 3 , Pages 313-334, October 2007